The University of Queensland has scrapped plans to dismantle its student area and take it as an enterprise center, which could be an indication that universities are lagging behind in excessive campus construction. Dr. Lee Duffield.
Big things are happening at Australian universities when a campaign by students, staff and citizens could start a big construction plan for them – but it could have happened at the University of Queensland (UQ) In the last few months.
Two years ago, a neo-liberal regime was being prepared Investment Big on St. Lucia Campus, With two built-up “hubs” to frame the famous Art Deco sandstone faडेade. As the expansion progressed, the university bought neighboring suburbs and built a bridge over the Brisbane River to lighten the long-dormant university dormitory area. West End.
Just like America
Project reflected Insult Many American universities have turned into real estate corporations – selling families of students (who can afford it), to their “dormitories” as luxury apartments.
That plan saw a decline in bulk learning and educational standards. Student “clients” were informed about their course work in the “experience survey” rewritten or omitted for crimes such as “multiple surveys”. To meet the student’s demand for “close attention” – will be phased out by expensive and willing academics, replaced by predicted planned contingent tutors, to meet the student’s demand for “close attention” – coaching for assessment.
Could that be happening here? UQ had its share of unofficial throwing in a shared crisis with UQ – It looked like On all Australian campuses with the launch of COVID-19.
It was also an upcoming “product” for “marketing” prospects: “online learning” and “learning centers” (more bean bags and WiFi points, and create your own curriculum). Generally, “you can study what you want, how you want it, where you want it and when you want it”.
In the US examples, schistosomiasis in this market would mean poor standards and management, simplified and limited valuation, with high failure rates. The lack of quality bachelors can be traced back to the most applied, talented and driving young professionals from poor countries for at least some time.
UQ was included in the magnificent architecture aforesaid Master plan Published by the then patriarchal administration in 201 Peter Hajj, A longtime South Australian academic of Danish background, who has researched in reticulation at the University of Adelaide and Went back there As patriarch last February.
There was market time for managerial positions at Australian universities – to transform them into corporations, steam-rolling changes through university follower senates, to appear in less opposition or as expected.
Walking on a snake
But what might have been unexpected would have been a feature of the UQ project: the demolition of the so-called student union in St. Lucia, a region traditionally governed by elected union councils and home to student activities – social, political and cultural. .
It had dramatic places Shonell Theater and Cinema Building, A union building, convention center and refinery. It was built around an open-air forum associated with large students Rallies From the Vietnam War era, and later it became the refuge of dictatorial state governments that imposed hostile sanctions. “Alternative” radio station 4ZZZ There was and recently feminist, LGBTI + and indigenous rights movements found a safe haven there.
Under the master plan most of it will be demolished immediately, to be replaced by “hubs” of buildings given for various purposes. It will be run by managed students; There will be a demonstration center to showcase study centers for university and student entrepreneurship and service and “teaching” of the industry, where the university administration had never entered the field for this purpose. Naturally, a mall can be expected with franchise outlets and a few fancy shops – but certainly no forum.
All cause alarm between student and staff and past students, Which arose a movement To try and stop it.
Movement – Possible Title Campaign to Save UQ Union Complex (SUQUC) – Many supporters were attracted, who, through mailouts, donated alumni to the university, Facebook, some sympathetic media, campus tours, sending delegations to the site, sending representatives to the radical forums of the late 1960s and 1960s. .
It was a legacy
Group It was argued That it is a “legacy” and plans to recognize the role it will play in Queensland’s mainstream life.
Heard in SUQUC Queensland Heritage CouncilThe buildings in the Union Complex were refuted on the grounds that they had seen change and transformation. It told university officials to the council that the principals were on an “old journey.”
SUQUC produced arguments from architects and others and was able to protect the quality of the surroundings. It brought documents related to the construction of the project from the late 1950s, in which the governor and vice-chancellor of the state, with traditional qualifications, declared ideas, which the students declared to be areas for freedom of thought.
It was agreed that the parties could still consult and then other complex concerns would kick the country.
Hajj was succeeded by a new patriarch, Professor, at the end of his term Deborah Terry, Another senior manager in higher education with a background in psychology discipline.
The new work, which came as an epidemic, came with the federal government deciding not to help universities any more – and now came with attractive fees for international students. To cut. The big days were stalling and so were the surpluses for expansion and growth, such as the master plan at UQ.
Signs of a sign came in June this year AlternatelyWhich, if done through it, would dramatically change the purpose of building for the future and show better from past times.
On June 18, a patriarch and two senior executive members met with three representatives of the community-based SUQUC and were somewhat surprised. Announcements.
University management is committed to respecting the history of the student sector and is called the “first principle” for redevelopment. They had already recommenced scoping and design studies and would be consulting work there.
There will be a shonnel theater and some nearby facilities; There are references in the forum, making sure that the design and redesign acknowledged its history; There will be facilities and space for the UK Union – and the whole area will be run by the student union, not the university management.
Why this change?
Of Announcement Coming from SUQUC, not UQ management, so there are still questions to ask. What the university is doing now is a little less visible Brobdnag Nagian The plan? Are we, perhaps, observing the new dawn of new Collegiate University management and the university’s host community – the sensitivity to the interests of the people of Queensland?
SUQUC campaign coordinator and main inspiration, Dr. Jeff RickertAccording to the university library, which deals with the memory of government intruders on campus in the 1980s, the work of the new university executive is invaluable.
In a SUQUC media release on July 2, Dr. Rickert Said:
We are ready to convince the university administration of its intentions and we interpret these as a major change because the previous administration made the plan publicly out of the plan … it would have been planned, general air-brushing and trashing. History and heritage. The redevelopment will now honor the history of the site, which is a step forward … What’s next we’ve proposed a consultation where the university will discuss plans for the student sector that we will put together with a reference group, first nation individuals, alumni activists And to include other groups closely related to the history of the site.
Media editor Dr. Lee Duffield A former ABC is a foreign correspondent, political journalist and academic.
Support independent journalism Subscribe To IA.